Comparative Analysis of Functional Outcome of Conventional Midline Parapatellar to Minimally Invasive Subvastus Approach in Total Knee Replacement

  • Butala R DR.D.Y.Patil hospital and medical college
  • Parelkar K DR.D.Y.PATIL MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
  • Pandey A DR.D.Y.Patil hospital and medical college
Keywords: TKR, Midline parapatellar approach, Minimally invasive subvastus approach

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive subvastus total knee replacement (TKR) has gained popularity over the past few years. Early results of this minimal invasive TKR have shown no clear advantage over conventional longer midline parapatellar approach in relation to the functional outcome and recovery. Hence we analyzed and compared the functional outcome of conventional midline longer parapatellar approach with minimal invasive subvastus approach in TKR surgery.

Material and methods: All cases operated for TKR by two approach minimally invasive subvastus approach or conventional midline parapatellar approach were compared for length of incision, amount of blood loss (drain in first 24-hrs), tourniquet time, visual analogue pain score, range of motion, straight leg raising (SLR), length of hospital stay, knee functional & objective society scores.

Results: 40 patients with mean age 65.3 years (range 59 to 72 years) of osteoarthritis knee who underwent TKR by conventional midline parapatellar approach or minimal invasive subvastus approach were included in the study. 27 were female and 13 were male. The mean incision length, mean tourniquet time and mean total blood loss in conventional midline parapatellar approach group was 18.85 cm (range 17 to 19 cm), 65.5 min (range 60 to 70 min) and 347.6 ml (range 240 to 460 ml) respectively. The mean incision length, mean tourniquet time and mean total blood loss in minimal invasive subvastus approach group was 10.30 cm (range 9 to 11 cm), 85 min (range 80 to 90 ml) and 293.35 ml (range 175 to 409 ml). The mean length of hospital stay was same in both the groups 6.8 days (range 5 to 9).

Conclusion: TKR by conventional midline parapatellar approach demonstrated better functional outcome, reduced operative time, reduced tissue trauma (lesser pressure by retractors), shorter learning curve, easier availability of implant and instrument sets and precise implant placement due to a good visualization of the surgical field in comparison to minimal invasive subvastus approach. Hence conventional midline parapatellar approach method which is tried and time tested, still holds important corner stone in TKR surgery and should be given due consideration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Silman AJ, Pearson JE. Epidemiology and genetics of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. 2002;4(Suppl 3):S265-72.

Akinpelu AO, Alonge TO, Adekanla BA, Odole AC. Prevalence and Pattern of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis in Nigeria: A Community-Based Study. Internet J Allied Health Sci Prac. 2009 Jul 01;7(3):10-4.

Pal CP, Singh P, Chaturvedi S, Pruthi KK, Vij A. Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in India and related factors. Indian J Orthop. 2016 Sep;50(5):518-22.

Solomon L, Beighton P, Lawrence JS. Rheumatic disorders in the South African Negro. Part II. Osteo-arthrosis. S Afr Med J. 1975 Oct 4;49(42):1737-40.

Davis MA, Ettinger WH, Neuhaus JM, Hauck WW. Sex differences in osteoarthritis of the knee. The role of obesity. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 May;127(5):1019-30.

Canovas F, Dagneaux L. Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Feb;104(1S):S41-S46.

Kozma CM, Slaton T, Paris A, Edgell ET. Cost and utilization of healthcare services for hip and knee replacement. J Med Econ. 2013 Jul;16(7):888-96.

Bonutti PM, Costa CR, Woehnl A, Johnson AJ, Mont MA. Results of MIS TKA at mean nine year follow-up. J Knee Surg. 2011 Sep;24(3):203-7.

Bonutti PM, Zywiel MG, Ulrich SD, Stroh DA, Seyler TM, Mont MA. A comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92(3):575-82.

Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, Ragland PS, Kester M. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(Suppl 2):26-32.

Alicea J. Knee Scores in Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Scuderi GR, Tria AJ (eds) Surgical Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, New York, NY 2002.

Scuderi GR, Tenholder M, Capeci C. Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):61-7.

Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):68-73.

Engh GA. Orthopaedic crossfire--can we justify unicondylar arthroplasty as a temporizing procedure in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17(4 Suppl 1):54-5.

Von Langenbeck B. ÜberdieSchussverietzungen des Hüftgelenks. Arch Klin Chir 1874;16:263.

Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE. Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Aug;(269):70-7.

Roysam GS, Oakley MJ. Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Jun;16(4):454-7.

Dutka J, Skowronek M, Sosin P, Skowronek P. Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in TKA: comparison of functional results. Orthop. 2011 Jun 14;34(6):148-53.

Bridgman SA, Walley G, MacKenzie G, Clement D, Griffiths D, Maffulli N. Sub-vastus approach is more effective than a medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee. 2009 Jun;16(3):216-22.

Weinhardt C, Barisic M, Bergmann EG, Heller KD. Early results of subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Jul;124(6):401-3.

Van Hemert WL, Senden R, Grimm B, van der Linde MJ, Lataster A, Heyligers IC. Early functional outcome after subvastus or parapatellar approach in knee arthroplasty is comparable. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Jun;19(6):943-51.

Teng Y, Du W, Jiang J, Gao X, Pan S, Wang J, An L, Ma J, Xia Y. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: meta-analysis. Orthopedics. 2012 Dec;35(12):e1722-31.

Bourke MG, Jull GA, Buttrum PJ, Fitzpatrick PL, Dalton PA, Russell TG. Comparing outcomes of medial parapatellar and subvastus approaches in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):347-53.

Bonutti PM, Mont MA, Kester MA. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a 10-feature evolutionary approach. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004 Apr;35(2):217-26.

Laskin RS, Beksac B, Phongjunakorn A, Pittors K, Davis J, Shim JC, Pavlov H, Petersen M. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):74-81.

Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
1.
Butala D, Parelkar K, Pandey D. Comparative Analysis of Functional Outcome of Conventional Midline Parapatellar to Minimally Invasive Subvastus Approach in Total Knee Replacement. ojmpc [Internet]. 2021Jun.30 [cited 2021Sep.28];27(2):70-4. Available from: https://ojmpc.com/index.php/ojmpc/article/view/137
Section
Original Article