Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures by Dynamic Hip Screw Vs Proximal Femoral Nailing
Abstract
Background:Inter trochanteric fractures are increasing as the incidence of contributing conditions like osteoporosis, old age and trauma increases. Unstable fractures pose a challenge in management of these fractures. Multiple options for fixation are available but the more commonly used DHS has its own pros and cons. Intra medullary devices offer more stable construct and a good functional outcome.
Method: A prospective study was done on 40 cases of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. They were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A was treated with DHS and group B with PFN. Post operatively the cases were followed up for a period of 2 years at regular intervals. Comparison between the two groups in terms of intra operative and post-operative advantages was done.
Results: Intra operative parameters like operative time and blood loss were more in DHS group whereas radiation exposure was more in PFN group. Post-operative parameters like duration of stay in hospital, early weight bearing, union rate, infection rate, implant failure was favourable in PFN group.
Conclusion: In treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures PFN is better than DHS.
Downloads
References
Cornwall R, Gilbert MS, Koval KJ, Strauss E, Siu AL. Functional Outcomes and Mortality Vary among Different Types of Hip Fractures: A Function of Patient Characteristics. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2004;(425):64-71.
Radford PJ, Needoff M, Webb JK. A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B. 1993;75(5):789–793.
Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert PT. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.
A randomized prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B. 1991;73(2):330–334.
Schipper IB, Bresina S, Wahl D, Linke B, Van Vugt AB, Schneider E. Biomechanical evaluation of the proximal femoral nail. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002;(405):277–286.
Pavelka T, Matejka J, Cervenková H. Complications of internal fixation by a short proximal femoral nail. Acta ChirOrthopTraumatolCech. 2005;72(6):344-54.
Windolf J, Hollander DA, Hakimi M, Linhart W. Pitfalls and complications in the use of the proximal femoral nail. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005 Feb;390(1):59-65.
Kumar R, Singh RN, Singh BN. Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femur. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2012;3(1):28-36.
Huang X, Leung F, Xiang Z, et al. Proximal Femoral Nail versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation for Trochanteric Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. The Scientific World Journal. 2013;2013:805805.
Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert PT. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Mar; 73(2):330-4.
Spivak JM, Zuckerman JD, Kumme FJ. Fatigue failure of sliding hip screw in hip fracture fixation: a report of three cases. J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5(3):325–31.
Baumgaertner MR, Solberg BD. Awareness of tip-apex distance reduces failure of fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Nov; 79(6):969-71
Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): A new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 1999;30:327–32.
Schipper IB, Bresina S, Wahl D, Linke B, Van Vugt AB, Schneider E. Biomechanical evaluation of the proximal femoral nail. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002;(405):277–286.
Gadegone WM, Salphale YS. Proximal femoral nail—an analysis of 100 cases of proximal femoral fractures with an average follow up of 1 year. International Orthopaedics. 2007;31(3):403–408.
Herman A, Landau Y, Gutman G, Ougortsin V, Chechick A, Shazar N. Radiological evaluation of intertrochanteric fracture fixation by the proximal femoral nail. Injury. 2012 Jun; 43(6):856-63.
Pan X-h, Xiao D-m, Lin B-w. Dynamic hip screws (DHS) and proximal femoral nails (PFN) in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of femur in elderly patients. Chin J Orthop Trauma. 2004;7:785–89.
Saudan M, Lübbeke A, Sadowski C, Riand N, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P. Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: a randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail.JOrthop Trauma. 2002 Jul; 16(6):386-93.
Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, Savolainen V, Hirvensalo E. Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with dynamic hip screws or a proximal femoral nail: A randomized study comparing post-operative rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(1):76–81.
Kumar R, Singh RN, Singh BN. Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femur. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2012;3(1):28-36.
The entire contents of the Orthopaedic Journal of Madhya Pradesh Chapter are protected under Indian and International copyrights. Orthopaedic Journal of Madhya Pradesh Chapter allow authors to retain the copyrights of their papers without restrictions, Authors grant the publisher the right of exclusive publication. The Journal then grants to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, perform and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works in any digital medium for any reasonable non-commercial purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship. The journal also grants the right to make numbers of printed copies for their personal non-commercial use under Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial share alike 4.0 International Public License.
OAI - Open Archives Initiative
