Introduction

Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the commonest fractures especially in the elderly with osteoporotic bones, usually due to low energy trauma. The overall increase in the incidence of trochanteric fracture can be attributed to two factors, one, increased life expectancy which increases the geriatric population, secondly high energy trauma which victimizes more number of young adults. Trochanter femoral nail (TFN) is a versatile implant for fixation of intertrochanteric fractures which include fractures of different geometry. Development of this nail progressed through various designs. Initial design was called as Mark I. Subsequent designs that followed were called Mark II and Mark III. Initially it was called Halifax Nail after the place where it was developed by Dr. Subhash Haldar. [1] A group of surgeons from Strasbourg changed the name of this nail to a universal one i.e. Gamma Nail as the shape resembled the Greek letter. [2] But these initial designs were associated with a host of per-operative complications when applied to Asiatic femora like jamming of nail, impingement of tip of nail on the anterior cortex and fracture of lateral cortex of femur. K. S. Leung in Hong Kong undertook an anthropometeric study on Asiatic femora to circumvent these complications and brought out a design called Asia Pacific gamma nail. [3,4] The history of treatment of trochanteric fractures has been of changes, modifications and evaluation. Though intertrochnateric fractures have been treated by variety of fixation devices, the present study was carried out by managing the fractures by TFN.

Materials and Methods

Thirty patients with fracture intertrochanteric femur (Evan’s type I, II, III, IV, V & R) [5] were treated by internal fixation using TFN over a period of 16 months from June 2011 to September 2013 at Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, R D Gardi Medical College & associated CRGH Hospital, Ujjain, M.P. The cases excluded were pathological intertrochanteric fractures, compound intertrochanteric fractures and patient with associated lower limb injuries, vertebral column injuries and incompletely recovered surgical illness as they act as confounding factors. Preoperative assessment of fracture geometry was done using Evan’s classification [5]. Intra operatively pattern of reduction achieved was seen on Anteroposterior and Lateral projections by image intensifier. Neck shaft angle measured on pre op & immediate post op x-ray with the help of Goniometer.

Table No. 5:

Distribution of sample by functional outcome in various age group.

Table No. 6:

Discussion

Most of patients in present study were from age group of 5th to 7th decade of life. Mean age in years for group operated is 63 yrs. This signifies the fact that patients from these age groups are involved in low energy trauma like fall at home.

Gallaghar et al (1980) reported an eight fold increase in trochanteric fractures in men over 80 years and women over 50 years of age. [7]

There was a male preponderance in our patient. Amongst them majority were in 5th-7th decade of life. The ratio of males to female was 2:1. H. B. Boyd and L. L. Griffin in their study of 300 cases found a marked sex difference. 226 (75.8%) of the patients were females and 74 (24.2%) were males.[8] Cleveland et al in their study had 87.7% of female patients. They had given the explanations for their observations which are females have slightly wider pelvis with a tendency to having coxa vara and they are usually less active and are more prone to senile osteoporosis. [9]

Most of our patients were 50 years and above in them domestic fall (fall at home) and trivial trauma was main reason behind fracture while in road traffic accident (RTA) young patients were affected. In our study, there were 17 cases (56.67%) due to domestic fall while there were 12 cases(40%) due to Road traffic accident(RTA) and 1 case (3.33%), it was due to assault. This may be attributed to the factors as enumerated by Cummings and Nevitt in 1994 as follows,

Table No. 7:

In our study, we observed Average Flouroscopic screening time was 163 seconds. Average blood loss was 138 ml In the series of Simon H. Bridle et al average blood loss was 162 ml. [17] In series of Christopher I Adams et al average blood loss was 244ml. [18] In recent study in June 2013 by Zhiyong et al the mean intra operative blood loss was 100 ml. [19]

The functional outcome of patient treated with trochanter femoral nail is calculated by the Modified Harris Hip Score, 89% of patients have excellent and good score. The functional outcome categorization was done on the basis of age group distribution and results showed that patients of 45-59 yrs age group had excellent score irrespective of type of fracture and patients of age group 75 yrs and more had fair score.

Conclusion

It is concluded that TFN in management of intertrochanteric fracture prevents excessive collapse & limb shortening. Thus it helps in achieving overall good functional outcome.

References