Orthopaedic Journal of MP Chapter

Publisher: Madhya Pradesh Orthopaedic Association www.mpioa.com
E-ISSN:2582-7243, P-ISSN:2320-6993
2016 Volume 22 Number 1 JAN-JUN

Plantar Fasciitis Treatment

Gohiya A1*, Choudhari P2, Sharma P3, Verma R4, Sharma S5

1* Gohiya A, Hamidia Hospital Campus, Bhopal, MP, India.

2 Choudhari P, Hamidia Hospital Campus, Bhopal, MP, India.

3 Sharma P, Hamidia Hospital Campus, Bhopal, MP, India.

4 Verma R, Hamidia Hospital Campus, Bhopal, MP, India.

5 Sharma S, Hamidia Hospital Campus, Bhopal, MP, India.

• Plantar Fasciitis is the most common cause of painful heel.
• Approach to heel pain involves a detailed history, thorough clinical examination and relevant investigations.
• Majority of the patients respond to non-operative treatment
• Out of number of non surgical options available which one to use first and in which one in particular group of patients is not clear

Keywords: Plantar Fasciitis, multifactoria, non-operative

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Gohiya A, , , Hamidia Hospital Campus, Bhopal, MP, India.
Email:
Gohiya A, Choudhari P, Sharma P, Verma R, Sharma S, Plantar Fasciitis Treatment. ojmpc. 2016;22(1):34-40.
Available From
https://ojmpc.com/index.php/ojmpc/article/view/26
Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2016-06-06 2016-06-12 2016-06-18 2016-06-24 2016-06-30
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
None Nil Yes 13.34

© 2016by Gohiya A, Choudhari P, Sharma P, Verma R, Sharma Sand Published by Madhya Pradesh Orthopaedic Association. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ unported [CC BY NC 4.0].

Introduction

Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of heel pain. Pain typically arise due to degenerative irritation at the insertion of plantar fascia on the medial process of the calcaneal tuberosity. In general plantar fasciitis is correlated with the heel spur which is not true. Approximately 10% of the United States population experiences bouts of heel pain, which results in 1 million visits per year to medical professionals for treatment of plantar fasciitis [1]. The etiology can be multifactorial however most cases are due to overuse stresses. Even though the condition is self-limiting it poses a challenge to the treating orthopaedician. Most of the patients respond to non-operative treatment measures [2].

Treatment

Careful and complete history, thorough clinical examination, organized, evidence based, stepwise approach to treatment gives good outcome. Self-limiting nature of the disease gives 90% success rate with non-operative measures. Understanding the etiology of the problem and directing treatment accordingly is the key to successful treatment of plantar fasciitis. Close attention must be paid during the history and physical examination to ensure that other potential causes of heel pain are not missed. An organized, evidence-based, stepwise approach to treatment will help achieve good outcomes. Also essential is educating the patient about the expected time of recovery [3,4,5]. Pain is due to irritation due to inflammation, so initial measures are aimed at reducing inflammation like icing, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), activity modification, corticosteroids, orthoses. Other modalities aim at resolving degeneration like autologous blood injection, Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection, nitroglycerin patches, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and surgery. Physical therapy targets both goals. Combination of these modalities can be used

Icing

It reduces inflammation it should be done after stretching and strengthening exercises.

Activity modification

Activity modification to the level of relative rest is critical for improvement. In patients with severe pain, a period of casting or immobilization in a boot cast may be necessary. In one study, 25% of patients considered rest to be the most effective form of treatment [6].

NSAIDs

Anti-inflammatory drugs are first line in management. Although there is controversy as to whether NSAIDs actually assist in the physiologic healing process, these agents can be useful as an adjunct for controlling pain while the individual’s plantar fasciitis is being treated with stretching, strengthening, and relative rest [6,7]. Daily dose during acute phase of treatment is necessary.

Corticosteroids

These can be used orally or via injections. Corticosteroid injections involve local, concentrated administration and are generally reserved for refractory cases [8]. Whether or not injected corticosteroids alter the long-term pathology of chronic inflammation, many patients experience acute symptomatic improvement [9,10]. One study found that ultrasound guided steroid injection provided short-term relief from pain in plantar fasciitis for up to 4 weeks and improvement in plantar fascia swelling for up to 12 weeks [11]. Whether or not the use of ultrasound guidance improves outcome of corticosteroid injections is unknown at present [12,13,14]. It can be relied on when palpation based injection has been unsuccessful [15].

A corticosteroid injection may be given through a plantar or a medial approach. Studies have reported success rates of 70% or better [3, 16].Corticosteroid injections have been shown to improve symptoms at 1 month but not at 6 months. It is recommended not to give more than 3 steroid injections within a year. A randomized, controlled study demonstrated that intralesional corticosteroid injection is more efficacious and more cost-effective than low- energy ESWT in the treatment of plantar fasciitis that has persisted for more than 6 weeks [17].The complications of corticosteroid injection include skin atrophy, skin hypopigmentation, soft-tissue atrophy, infection, bleeding, and failure to work. A steroid flare-up, which consists of increased pain for up to several days, may occur in up to 2% patients [9]. Plantar fascia rupture was reported in 10% of patients in one case series [18]. Allergic reaction and infection are rare complications.

Botulinum toxin A

A short-term, randomized, controlled, double-blind study found that botulinum toxin type A injection appeared to provide significant improvements in pain relief [19]. Another study found that ultrasound-guided injection of botulinum toxin type A did not induce the complication of fat pad atrophy but was successful at improving the maximal center of pressure loading in the foot [20]. A randomized, controlled, double-blind study compared botulinum toxin type A injection to corticosteroid injection in 36 patients and found more rapid and sustained response in the botulinum toxin injected group [21].

Autologous blood

Injection of autologous blood into the calcaneal attachment of plantar fascia is thought to stimulate an acute inflammatory reaction, providing factors that stimulate fibroblast activity and vascular growth and thereby healing of lesion. Few studies support use of this modality for treatment of heel pain attributed to plantar fasciitis [22,23,24].

Platelet rich plasma

There is some evidence to suggest that platelet-rich plasma may be beneficial in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis [25, 26].


x

Although both autologous blood and PRP injections appear to relieve symptoms of plantar fasciitis, these have no significant difference compared to corticosteroid injection [27,28].

Cryopreserved human amniotic membrane

Cryopreserved human amniotic membrane which contain growth factors, cytokines and matrix component are considered to promote tissue healing. This experimental treatment was evaluated by a randomized, controlled, double blind, study of 23 patients, at 12 week follow-up results were comparable to corticosteroid injection group [29].

Extracorporeal Shock-wave Therapy (ESWT)

ESWT has been proposed as a treatment option for plantar fasciitis. Bombardment of the tissue with high-pressure sound waves stimulate blood flow to stimulate healing, and shut down the neuronal pain pathways through the pulses hitting the affected nerves. ESWT is noninvasive, has few adverse side effects, and is associated with a satisfactory results in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis.

In 2013, two meta-analyses concluded that ESWT could be a safe and effective nonsurgical treatment for plantar fasciitis [30, 31]. Some studies shown favorable results with success rate of 50-90% but overall results have been mixed so it is recommended to be used only after other measures have failed [32-35]. A Comparative study between ESWT and conventional physiotherapy showed similar results at 3 month follow-up [36].

Night Splints

During sleep plantar flexion leads to shortened plantar fascia, night splint maintain plantigrade position providing passive stretch to plantar fascia [37]. The passive stretching provided by night splint helps prevent microtrauma at the plantar fascia attachment with the first steps out of bed in the morning.

Use of night splint though cumbersome has 95% compliance [38] various studies shown excellent results in terms of improvement in symptoms [38-42]. Night splints are especially useful in individuals who have had symptoms of plantar fasciitis for longer than 12 months as suggested by some studies [38-42]. In one study 14 % patients considered shoe change a satisfactory treatment [6].

Shoe inserts can be used with shoes. A randomized, prospective study suggested that more supportive orthotics resulted in better pain relief as compared to softer, non-supportive orthotics [43].

Orthosis

Foot strike generates forces which are not absorbed and patients with low arch experience stress [44]. Studies support use of taping, arch support and custom orthotic devices for conservative treatment [6, 45, 46]. Taping may be more cost-effective for the acute onset of plantar fasciitis, whereas OTC arch supports and orthotics may be more cost-effective for chronic or recurrent cases of plantar fasciitis and for the prevention of injuries.

Heel pads are widely used, but they are generally useful only for shock absorption and do not provide support or structural control [47]. A meta-analysis concluded that kinesiotaping was no more effective than standard taping techniques [48].

Physical Therapy

Physical therapy along with contrast bath, ultrasonography and iontophoresis help in resolution of symptoms. In one study, iontophoresis was found to improve symptoms faster but it had no effect on long-term outcome [49]. Physical therapy programs may be divided into stretching, strengthening, and maintenance phases.

  • Stretching: Stretching of calf and foot resulted in successful relief in 83% patients, though the exact benefit are not known [6,50]. Wall stretching with the knee in both the extended and flexed positions, stair stretching, and towel stretching are all commonly employed. Stretching targeted at the plantar fascia are particularly important, passive stretching of toes and Achilles tendon increases the effectiveness [51].
  • Strengthening: Strengthening of intrinsic foot muscles have proved beneficial [52] exercises include towel curls, marble pickups and toe taps [53].
  • Maintenance Phase: Stretching and strengthening at least 2-3 times per week should be continued to prevent recurrence of symptoms.

Fasciotomy

Surgery may be required in 5-10% of patients not responding to non-operative measures for 6-12 months [3,4,5,54]. Plantar fascia release performed by sectioning part or all of the fascia has been the mainstay of treatment [55,56]. However release of the plantar fascia results in instability of the medial column of the foot and lateral column pain due to overload [57]. 70 – 90 % success rate is reported with surgical release [58-63]. Bazaz & Ferkel [64] reported endoscopic release to provide improved outcomes for patients with less severe symptoms. Potential complications of surgical intervention include flattening of the longitudinal arch leading to strain and heel hypoesthesia [18, 65].

Percutaneous Partial Fasciotomy

Percutaneous release though offer quick return to function, have similar long term results as open fasciotomy [66].

Cryosurgery

A prospective study of 61 cases using small cryoprobe inserted percutaneously to destroy pathologic tissue at -700 C temperature concluded it to be an effective modality of treatment [67]. Another study reported 77% success rate at 2 year follow-up in 137 feet by this modality [68].

Bipolar Radiofrequency Microdebridement

This new technique applies radiofrequency pulse to the plantar fascia, gives equivalent results as compared to traditional surgical methods.


It has added advantage of earlier pain relief, decreased morbidity and early return to work. After 11 months of this procedure patients in a study achieved an average American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hind foot score of 92 out of 105 [69]. Long term randomized double blind studies are recommended to prove it’s superiority over other modalities.

References

1. Riddle DL, Schappert SM. Volume of ambulatory care visits and patterns of care for patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis: a national study of medical doctors. Foot Ankle Int. 2004 May. 25(5):303-10 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

2. Lennard TA. Fundamentals of procedural care. Lennard TA, ed. Physiatric Procedures in Clinical Practic. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1995. 1-13 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

3. Furey JG. Plantar fasciitis. The painful heel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Jul. 57(5):672-3 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

4. Gill LH, Kiebzak GM. Outcome of nonsurgical treatment for plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 1996 Sep. 17(9):527-32 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

5. Davis PF, Severud E, Baxter DE. Painful heel syndrome: results of nonoperative treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Oct. 15(10):531-5 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

6. Wolgin M, Cook C, Graham C, Mauldin D. Conservative treatment of plantar heel pain: long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Mar. 15(3):97-102 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

7. Stanley KL, Weaver JE. Pharmacologic management of pain and inflammation in athletes. Clin Sports Med. 1998 Apr. 17(2):375-92 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

8. Crawford F, Atkins D, Young P, Edwards J. Steroid injection for heel pain: evidence of short-term effectiveness. A randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999 Oct. 38(10):974-7 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

9. Pfenninger JL. Joint and soft tissue aspiration and injection. Pfenninger JL, Fowler GC, eds. Procedures for Primary Care Physicians. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1994. 1036-54 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

10. Yucel I, Yazici B, Degirmenci E, Erdogmus B, Dogan S. Comparison of ultrasound-, palpation-, and scintigraphy-guided steroid injections in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 May. 129(5):695-701 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

11. McMillan AM, Landorf KB, Gilheany MF, Bird AR, Morrow AD, Menz HB. Ultrasound guided corticosteroid injection for plantar fasciitis: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2012 May 22. 344:e3260 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

12. Chen CM, Chen JS, Tsai WC, Hsu HC, Chen KH, Lin CH. Effectiveness of device-assisted ultrasound-guided steroid injection for treating plantar fasciitis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jul. 92(7):597-605 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

13. Ball EM, McKeeman HM, Patterson C, Burns J, Yau WH, Moore OA, et al. Steroid injection for inferior heel pain: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun. 72(6):996-1002 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

14. Ball EM, McKeeman HM, Patterson C, et al. Steroid injection for inferior heel pain: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun. 72(6):996-1002 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

15. Kane D, Greaney T, Bresnihan B, Gibney R, FitzGerald O. Ultrasound guided injection of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Jun. 57(6):383-4 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

16. Kane D, Greaney T, Bresnihan B, Gibney R, FitzGerald O. Ultrasound guided injection of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Jun. 57(6):383-4 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

17. Porter MD, Shadbolt B. Intralesional corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciopathy. Clin J Sport Med. 2005 May. 15(3):119-24 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

18. Acevedo JI, Beskin JL. Complications of plantar fascia rupture associated with corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Feb. 19(2):91-7 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

19. Babcock MS, Foster L, Pasquina P, Jabbari B. Treatment of pain attributed to plantar fasciitis with botulinum toxin a: a short-term, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep. 84(9):649-54 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

20. Huang YC, Wei SH, Wang HK, Lieu FK. Ultrasonographic guided botulinum toxin type A treatment for plantar fasciitis: an outcome-based investigation for treating pain and gait changes. J Rehabil Med. 2010 Feb. 42(2):136-40 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

21. Elizondo-Rodriguez J, Araujo-Lopez Y, Moreno-Gonzalez JA, Cardenas-Estrada E, Mendoza-Lemus O, Acosta-Olivo C. A comparison of botulinum toxin a and intralesional steroids for the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized, double-blinded study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan. 34(1):8-14 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

22. Martin RP. Autologous blood injection for plantar fasciitis: a retrospective study. Paper presented at: Annual meeting of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine; April 16-20, 2005; Austin, Texas. Clin J Sport Med. 2005 Sept. 15:387-8 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]


23. Kiter E, Celikbas E, Akkaya S, Demirkan F, Kiliç BA. Comparison of injection modalities in the treatment of plantar heel pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2006 Jul-Aug. 96(4):293-6 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

24. Lee TG, Ahmad TS. Intralesional autologous blood injection compared to corticosteroid injection for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Sep. 28(9):984-90 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

25. Kumar V, Millar T, Murphy PN, Clough T. The treatment of intractable plantar fasciitis with platelet-rich plasma injection. Foot (Edinb). 2013 Jun-Sep. 23(2-3):74-7 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

26. Van Egmond JC, Breugem SJ, Driessen M, Bruijn DJ. Platelet-Rich-Plasma injection seems to be effective in treatment of plantar fasciitis: a case series. Acta Orthop Belgica. 2015 Jun. 81:315-20 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

27. Lee TG, Ahmad TS. Intralesional autologous blood injection compared to corticosteroid injection for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Sep. 28(9):984-90 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

28. Kiter E, Celikbas E, Akkaya S, Demirkan F, Kiliç BA. Comparison of injection modalities in the treatment of plantar heel pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2006 Jul-Aug. 96(4):293-6 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

29. Hanselman AE, Tidwell JE, Santrock RD. Cryopreserved human amniotic membrane injection for plantar fasciitis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind pilot study. Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Feb. 36:151-8 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

30. Aqil A, Siddiqui MR, Solan M, Redfern DJ, Gulati V, Cobb JP. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is effective in treating chronic plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis of RCTs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov. 471(11):3645-52 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

31. Dizon JN, Gonzalez-Suarez C, Zamora MT, Gambito ED. Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in chronic plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jul. 92(7):606-20 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

32. Rompe JD, Decking J, Schoellner C, Nafe B. Shock wave application for chronic plantar fasciitis in running athletes. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Mar-Apr. 31(2):268-75 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

33. Hyer CF, Vancourt R, Block A. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005 Mar-Apr. 44(2):137-43 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

34. Alvarez R. , Cross, G. L. , Levitt, R. , Gould, et al. Chronic proximal Plantar Fasciitis Treatment Results with the Ossatron ESW System. FDA Investigational Study P990086, approval 10-12-2000 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

35. Chuckpaiwong B, Berkson EM, Theodore GH. Extracorporeal shock wave for chronic proximal plantar fasciitis: 225 patients with results and outcome predictors. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009 Mar-Apr. 48(2):148-55 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

36. Greve JM, Grecco MV, Santos-Silva PR. Comparison of radial shockwaves and conventional physiotherapy for treating plantar fasciitis. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009. 64(2):97-103 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

37. Martin JE, Hosch JC, Goforth WP, Murff RT, Lynch DM, Odom RD. Mechanical treatment of plantar fasciitis. A prospective study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001 Feb. 91(2):55-62 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

38. Berlet GC, Anderson RB, Davis H, Kiebzak GM. A prospective trial of night splinting in the treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: the Ankle Dorsiflexion Dynasplint. Orthopedics. 2002 Nov. 25(11):1273-5 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

39. Batt ME, Tanji JL, Skattum N. Plantar fasciitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial of the tension night splint. Clin J Sport Med. 1996 Jul. 6(3):158-62 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

40. Wapner KL, Sharkey PF. The use of night splints for treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle. 1991 Dec. 12(3):135-7 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

41. Powell M, Post WR, Keener J, Wearden S. Effective treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis with dorsiflexion night splints: a crossover prospective randomized outcome study. Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Jan. 19(1):10-8 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

42. Mizel MS, Marymont JV, Trepman E. Treatment of plantar fasciitis with a night splint and shoe modification consisting of a steel shank and anterior rocker bottom. Foot Ankle Int. 1996 Dec. 17(12):732-5 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

43. Walther M, Kratschmer B, Verschl J, Volkering C, Altenberger S, Kriegelstein S, et al. Effect of different orthotic concepts as first line treatment of plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Jun. 19(2):103-7 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

44. Reid DC. Running: injury patterns and prevention. Sports Injury Assessment and Rehabilitation. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1992. 1131-58 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

45. Lynch DM, Goforth WP, Martin JE, et al. Conservative treatment of plantar fasciitis. A prospective study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998 Aug. 88(8):375-80 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]


46. Van de Water AT, Speksnijder CM. Efficacy of taping for the treatment of plantar fasciosis: a systematic review of controlled trials. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb. 100(1):41-51 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

47. Chia KK, Suresh S, Kuah A, Ong JL, Phua JM, Seah AL. Comparative trial of the foot pressure patterns between corrective orthotics,formthotics, bone spur pads and flat insoles in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2009 Oct. 38(10):869-75 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

48. Morris D, Jones D, Ryan H, Ryan CG. The clinical effects of Kinesio® Tex taping: A systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013 May. 29(4):259-70 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

49. Gudeman SD, Eisele SA, Heidt RS Jr, Colosimo AJ, Stroupe AL. Treatment of plantar fasciitis by iontophoresis of 0. 4% dexamethasone. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am J Sports Med. 1997 May-Jun. 25(3):312-6 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

50. Radford JA, Landorf KB, Buchbinder R, Cook C. Effectiveness of calf muscle stretching for the short-term treatment of plantar heel pain: a randomised trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Apr 19. 8:36 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

51. DiGiovanni BF, Nawoczenski DA, Lintal ME, et al. Tissue-specific plantar fascia-stretching exercise enhances outcomes in patients with chronic heel pain. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jul. 85-A(7):1270-7 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

52. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Conti SF. Outcome study of subjects with insertional plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Dec. 19(12):803-11 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

53. Young CC, Rutherford DS, Niedfeldt MW. Treatment of plantar fasciitis. Am Fam Physician. 2001 Feb 1. 63(3):467-74, 477-8 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

54. Miyamoto W, Takao M, Uchio Y. Calcaneal osteotomy for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Feb. 130(2):151-4 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

55. Tomczak RL, Haverstock BD. A retrospective comparison of endoscopic plantar fasciotomy to open plantar fasciotomy with heel spur resection for chronic plantar fasciitis/heel spur syndrome. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1995 May-Jun. 34(3):305-11 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

56. Kinley S, Frascone S, Calderone D, Wertheimer SJ, Squire MA, Wiseman FA. Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy versus traditional open heel spur surgery: a prospective study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1993. 32:595-603 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

57. Malay DS, Pressman MM, Assili A, et al. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic proximal plantar fasciitis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter intervention trial. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug. 45(4):196-210 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

58. Daly PJ, Kitaoka HB, Chao EY. Plantar fasciotomy for intractable plantar fasciitis: clinical results and biomechanical evaluation. Foot Ankle. 1992 May. 13(4):188-95 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

59. Leach RE, Seavey MS, Salter DK. Results of surgery in athletes with plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle. 1986 Dec. 7(3):156-61 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

60. Benton-Weil W, Borrelli AH, Weil LS Jr, Weil LS Sr. Percutaneous plantar fasciotomy: a minimally invasive procedure for recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1998 Jul-Aug. 37(4):269-72 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

61. Sollitto RJ, Plotkin EL, Klein PG, Mullin P. Early clinical results of the use of radiofrequency lesioning in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1997 May-Jun. 36(3):215-9; discussion 256 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

62. Conflitti JM, Tarquinio TA. Operative outcome of partial plantar fasciectomy and neurolysis to the nerve of the abductor digiti minimi muscle for recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Jul. 25(7):482-7 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

63. Jerosch J, Schunck J, Liebsch D, Filler T. Indication, surgical technique and results of endoscopic fascial release in plantar fasciitis (E FRPF). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004 Sep. 12(5):471-7 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

64. Bazaz R, Ferkel RD. Results of endoscopic plantar fascia release. Foot Ankle Int. 2007 May. 28(5):549-56 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

65. Sellman JR. Plantar fascia rupture associated with corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Jul. 15(7):376-81 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

66. Fallat LM, Cox JT, Chahal R, Morrison P, Kish J. A retrospective comparison of percutaneous plantar fasciotomy and open plantar fasciotomy with heel spur resection. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 May-Jun. 52(3):288-90 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

67. Allen BH, Fallat LM, Schwartz SM. Cryosurgery: an innovative technique for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr. 46(2):75-9 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

68. Cavazos GJ, Khan KH, D'Antoni AV, Harkless LB, Lopez D. Cryosurgery for the treatment of heel pain. Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Jun. 30(6):500-5. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]


69. Sorensen MD, Hyer CF. Bi-Polar Radiofrequency Microdebridement in the Treatment of Chronic Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis. Presented at the American College of Foot & Ankle Surgeons Annual Meeting, 2009, Washington, D. C. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]


Disclaimer / Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of Journals and/or the editor(s). Journals and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.