Orthopaedic Journal of MP Chapter

Publisher: Madhya Pradesh Orthopaedic Association www.mpioa.com
E-ISSN:2582-7243, P-ISSN:2320-6993
2022 Volume 28 Number 2 Jul-Dec

Uncemented Total Hip Replacement with impaction bone grafting in Protrusio Acetabuli in AVN hip

Singh V1*, Jain P2, Bhinde S3, Agrawal A4

1* Vivek Singh, Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, R D Gardi Medical College and CRG Hospital and Associated Charitable Hospital, Ujjain, Mp, India.

2 P Jain, Department of Orthopaedics, R D Gardi Medical College and CRG Hospital and Associated Charitable Hospital, Ujjain, Mp, India.

3 S Bhinde, Department of Orthopaedics, R D Gardi Medical College and CRG Hospital and Associated Charitable Hospital, Ujjain, Mp, India.

4 A Agrawal, Department of Orthopaedics, R D Gardi Medical College and CRG Hospital and Associated Charitable Hospital, Ujjain, Mp, India.

Background and Aim: Protrusio acetabuli is a central acetabular defect resulting from migration of femoral head medial to Kohler’s line. Idiopathic central displacement of femoral head within the acetabulum is quite rare. However, it may be seen in arthritic hips secondary to rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, previous trauma, osteomalacia, etc. Primary Total Hip Replacement (THR) in such cases is difficult because of the deficient medial bone, decreased peripheral bony support to the acetabular component and proximal and medial migration of the joint centre. Several techniques described previously in the surgical management of protrusio acetabuli include cemented acetabular components with cement alone or in association with morselized bone graft to reconstruct the acetabulum. However, cement has high rates of migration and loosening of cemented acetabular components in young patients leads to more revision surgeries within the first decade of implantation. The purpose of the study is to describe the technique and results of using impacted morselized bone graft with a porous coated cementless acetabular component in patients with protrusio acetabuli.

Material and methods: A total of 20 primary THR’s (10 unilateral and 5 bilateral) in 15 patients (8 females and 7 males) with protrusio acetabuli were performed between 2018 and 2022, out of which 4 had mild,7 had moderate and 9 had a severe grade of protrusion.

Results: A total of 10 hips were affected by rheumatoid arthritis, 3 by ankylosing spondylitis and 7 had unknown etiology. After the surgery, all bone grafts had united by the sixth month with no perceptible change in acetabular component position in any case. The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score was 48 which improved to 90 at the latest follow-up10 hips (50%) had excellent,8 hips (40%) had good, and 2 hips (10%) had fair results. There was no dislocation.

Conclusion: The use of impacted morselized autograft with a cementless porous acetabular component is a good technique of restoration of hip biomechanics and sound fixation in cases of protrusio acetabuli.

Keywords: Protrusio Acetabuli, Morselised Bone Graft, Uncemented Total Hip Replacement

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Vivek Singh, Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, R D Gardi Medical College and CRG Hospital and Associated Charitable Hospital, Ujjain, Mp, India.
Email:
Singh V, Jain P, Bhinde S, Agrawal A, Uncemented Total Hip Replacement with impaction bone grafting in Protrusio Acetabuli in AVN hip. ojmpc. 2022;28(2):60-64.
Available From
https://ojmpc.com/index.php/ojmpc/article/view/160
Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2022-12-03 2022-12-10 2022-12-17 2022-12-24 2022-12-31
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
Authors state no conflict of interest. Non Funded. The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use. 13.65 All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

© 2022by Singh V, Jain P, Bhinde S, Agrawal Aand Published by Madhya Pradesh Orthopaedic Association. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ unported [CC BY NC 4.0].

Introduction

Protrusio acetabuli is a central acetabular defect resulting from migration of femoral head medial to Kohler’s line (1). This results in medialization of the center of rotation (COR) of the hip. Primary Total Hip Replacement (THR) in such situations can be technically demanding due to associated significant medial and proximal migration of the center of the joint, deficient bone medially (2) and reduced bony support to the acetabular component peripherally.

ojmpc_160_01.jpg
Figure 1: Protrusio Acetabuli

Cemented total hip arthroplasty resulted in promoting bone lysis and implant loosening, however, uncemented total hip arthroplasty with impacted morselized autograft with a porous coated cementless acetabular component provided a biological solution to bone deficiency and long-term fixation in arthritic hips with protrusion.(3,4) Functional outcome of uncemented total hip arthroplasty was evaluated by Harris hip score pre & post operatively in the cases. (5)(6)

Classification:

ojmpc_160_02.jpg
Figure 2: Sotelo-Garza and Charnley Classification (5)

The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional and radiological outcome of using impacted morselized autograft with a porous coated cementless cup in cases of protrusio acetabuli of hip joint. (7)(8)

Material and Methods

This is an observational study conducted at R.D. Gardi Medical College and associated CRGH, Ujjain (M.P.), between period August 2018 to July 2022 on a total of 20 cases who are fulfilling the Inclusion criteria.

All the patients included in the study were functionally evaluated by Harris hip score, preoperatively along with an X-Ray of pelvis with both hips. Surgery was performed with the patient in the lateral position. All the patients were operated with uncemented total hip replacement by a standard posterior (Southern Moore) approach. Same type of implant was used in all the patients. Dislocation of hip was challenging due to deepened acetabulum and medial displacement of the femoral head. It was facilitated by an extensive capsulotomy, along with simultaneous and sustained gentle traction and rotation. Removal of posterior osteophytes before dislocation also helped. Adductor tenotomy performed in cases with excessive adductor tightness. In cases of difficult dislocation, femoral neck was resected in situ and the femoral head was excised piecemeal.

ojmpc_160_03.jpg
Figure 3: Bone slice

Normally, before neck osteotomy, dislocated femoral head was cut into slices with a power saw. The bone slices were then morselized into 8mm-10mm sized pieces using a bone cutter.

The morselized graft was then introduced into the prepared acetabulum and impacted against the floor using hemispherical impactors. Reverse direction reaming was done to further impact and set the graft in the floor of acetabulum. An acetabular cup trial was inserted to ensure good peripheral fit and more than 50% contact with the host bone. Finally, the chosen acetabular component was impacted into place. Post operative AP X-Ray view of the operated hip obtained. Abduction pillow used during the sleeping time for 7-10 days post-operatively.


Active and active assisted range of motion exercises started within the first 24-48 hrs. Partial weight bearing with a walker was advised up to 3 months until bone grafts appeared to be incorporated in x-ray. Full weight bearing started at 3 months. Patients were advised not to squat, not to sit crossed legged and not cross the leg across midline. Patients were called upon at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow ups. At each visit functional outcome was taken according to Harris Hip score along with an X-ray pelvis with both hips.

ojmpc_160_04.jpg
Figure 4: Morsellised autograft

After neck osteotomy, acetabular floor prepared while avoiding penetration of a soft, deficient medial wall until a bleeding bony surface was obtained. Acetabular periphery reamed using large sized reamers initially.

Results

Maximum patients (10) were in the age group of 50-60 years, with a female predominance of 8 patients (53%), and 7 male patients (47%). 10 patients had unilateral involvement whereas 5 patients had bilateral involvement. The most common etiology was found to be Rheumatoid Arthritis (10) followed by Idiopathic (7) followed by Ankylosing Spondylitis (3). 4 had mild, 7 had moderate and 9 had severe grades of protrusio. The operation time ranged from 60 to 120 minutes (mean= 79.4 ±14 mins). The blood loss ranged from 200-400 ml (mean=262±36 ml).

Table 1: Comparative mean values of Harris hip score at pre op, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year follow up

HARRIS HIP SCORE
S. NoPRE OP6 weeks03 Months06 Months01 Year
148.447268.036476.200484.642890.0852

The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score was 48 which improved to 90 at the latest follow-up. 10 hips (50%) had excellent,8 hips (40%) had good, and 2 hips (10%) had fair results.

There was no dislocation. The mean acetabular inclination angle was 44.2° (range 39°-47°). The distance from the femoral head center to Kohler’s line improved from 17.98 preoperatively to 20.36 post operatively).

CASE – 1

ojmpc_160_05.jpg

ojmpc_160_07.jpgojmpc_160_09.jpgFigure : 9,10 and 11 One year follow up


Discussion

Study by Mullaji et al suggested that the use of impacted morselized autograft in conjunction with porous coated cementless acetabular component restored hip biomechanics, after an intermediate duration follow up. 30 primary THR’s were conducted with a 4.2 year follow up which showed excellent outcome in 90% patients, fair in 7 % patients and poor in 3% patients.(9)

Study by Atanu et al showed that using only cement for acetabular reconstruction in protrusio acetabuli has had unacceptably high rates of recurrence, with components migrating into the acetabulum and occurrence of thermal necrosis of the thinned out medial wall due to heat polymerization of the cement. (10) These were some of the factors responsible for poor outcome.

Table 2: Comparison of results of different techniques used to treat acetabular protrusio with primary THR in literature published since 2000

StudiesNo. of HipsMean age at surgery(years)TechniqueSurvival rate of acetabular components
Mullaii et al(9)3046Impacted morselissed bone graft with cementless cup100% at 4.2 years
Garcia Cimbrelo et al(11)14854Cemented polyethylene component79% at 16 years
Pereira et al(12)2362Impacted, morsellised bone graft with cementless component100% at 7.8 years
Rosenberg et al(13)3653Impacted bone graft with cemented component90% at 12 years
Krushell et al(14)2966Impacted, morsellised bone graft with dual geometry cementless component100% at 2 years
Current study954Impacted, morsellised bone graft with cementless cup100% at 2 years

Conclusion

We treated 20 cases of Protrusio Acetabuli of mild, moderate, and severe grades by Sotello-Garza and Charnley by uncemented total hip arthroplasty using morselized autograft. It helps in restoring biomechanics of hip joint and preventing recurrence of protrusio. We observed fair, good, and excellent functional outcomes in our patients.

There was no evidence of progression of protrusio or socket loosening in any of our cases. Osteolytic lesions were also not encountered in our study. All bone grafts united within 4-6 months after surgery and continuous trabecular bone that grew through the host bone and the bone graft was apparent. But a larger sample size and a longer follow up are required to ascertain this fact.

References

1. Ries MD. Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular protrusio. Orthopedics. 2009 Sep;32(9):orthosupersite. com/view.asp?rID=42836. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090728-12. PMID: 19751015 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

2. Martin CT, Heiner AD, Baer TE, Pugely AJ, Noiseux NO. Protrusio After Medial Acetabular Wall Breach in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Iowa Orthop J. 2015;35:99-107. PMID: 26361450; PMCID: PMC4492152 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

3. Gerber SD, Harris WH. Femoral head autografting to augment acetabular deficiency in patients requiring total hip replacement. A minimum five-year and an average seven-year follow-up study. JBJS. 1986 Oct 1;68(8):1241-8 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

4. Zhen P, Li X, Zhou S, Lu H, Chen H, Liu J. Total hip arthroplasty to treat acetabular protrusions secondary to rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2018 Dec;13(1):1-7. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

5. Sotelo-Garza A, Charnley J. The results of Charnley arthroplasty of the hip performed for protrusio acetabuli. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 1978 May 1(132):12-8. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

6. Greig, Danielle MD; Hsiue, Peter P. MD; Chen, Clark J. BS; Trikha, Rishi MD; Khoshbin, Amir MD; Stavrakis, Alexandra I. MD. Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular Protrusio. JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews: July 2020 - Volume 4 - Issue 7 - p e20.00121 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

7. Tom J. J. H. Slooff, Rik Huiskes, Jim van Horn & Albert J. Lemmens (1984) Bone grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusion, Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 55:6, 593-596, DOI: 10.3109/17453678408992402 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

8. Zwartele RE, Witjes S, Doets HC, Stijnen T, Poll RG. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:535–46. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

9. Mullaji AB, Shetty GM. Acetabular protrusio: surgical technique of dealing with a problem in depth. The bone & joint journal. 2013 Nov;95(11_Supple_A):37-40. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

10. Mohanty A, Parida S, Biswas R, Mohanty A. Evaluation of. Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in Acetabular Protrusio. . [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]


11. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Diaz-Martin A, Madero R, Munuera L. Loosening of the cup after low-friction arthroplasty in patients with acetabular protrusion: the importance of the position of the cup. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume. 2000 Jan;82(1):108-15 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

12. Pereira GC, Kubiak EN, Levine B, Chen FS, Di Cesare PE. Cavitary acetabular defects treated with morselized cancellous bone graft and cementless cups. International orthopaedics. 2007 Aug;31(4):445-50. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

13. Rosenberg WW, Schreurs BW, Malefijt MC, Veth RP, Slooff TJ. Impacted morsellized bone grafting and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular protrusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an 8-to 18-year follow-up study of 36 hips. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 2000 Jan 1;71(2):143-6. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

14. Krushell RJ, Fingeroth RJ, Gelling B. Primary total hip arthroplasty using a dual-geometry cup to treat protrusio acetabuli. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2008 Dec 1;23(8):1128-31. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

Disclaimer / Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of Journals and/or the editor(s). Journals and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.