Orthopaedic Journal of MP Chapter

Publisher: Madhya Pradesh Orthopaedic Association www.mpioa.com
E-ISSN:2582-7243, P-ISSN:2320-6993
2021 Volume 27 Number 2 Jul-Dec

To Evaluate the Functional Outcome of Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy in Osteoarthritis of Knee

Jati S1, Bansal H2*, Garg A3, Jain S4

1 S Jati, Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Aurobindo Medical Science and Post Graduate Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

2* Himanshu Bansal, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Aurobindo Medical Science and Post Graduate Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

3 A Garg, Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Aurobindo Medical Science and Post Graduate Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

4 S Jain, Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Aurobindo Medical Science and Post Graduate Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Background: Osteoarthritis of knee is a chronic, degenerative condition associated with pain, deformity, disability, difficulty in movements and reduction in the quality of life. This study aims to assess the efficacy of intra-articular injection of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) therapy in the management of osteoarthritis of knee.

Material and methods: 50 patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis were treated by 5 ml autologous intra-articular PRP injection and were assessed for pain, quality of life and rate of satisfaction by WOMAC score.

Results: 50 cases (KL grade II 18 and grade III 22) were included in the study. In KL grade II, the mean WOMAC score, pretreatment was 57.11 ± 6.36, which improved to 53.76 + 7.6 (p=0.000) at 2 weeks, to 31.97 ± 4.51 (p=0.001) at one month, to 26.97 ± 3.47(p=0.001) at 3 months and to 22.11 ± 2.99 (p=0.001) at final follow-up of 6 months. In KL grade III, the mean WOMAC score pretreatment was 59.21 ± 5.63, which improved to 55.76 ± 7.6 (p=0.000) at 2 weeks, to 48.79 ± 5.42 (p=0.001) at one month, to 36.46 ± 4.36 (p=0.001) at 3 months, and to 32.12 ± 2.66 (p=0.001) at final follow-up of 6 months.

Conclusion: Use of single PRP intra-articular injection in the management of osteoarthritis knee provides excellent pain relief, improvement in quality of life and high rate of satisfaction, which is more effective in the early stages of osteoarthritis than the advanced stage. Relief starts immediately and it increases gradually with time. PRP is a safe, easy, minimally invasive and cheap alternative in the management of knee osteoarthritis.

Keywords: Platelet rich plasma, Osteoarthritis, WOMAC score

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Himanshu Bansal, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Aurobindo Medical Science and Post Graduate Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Email:
Jati S, Bansal H, Garg A, Jain S, To Evaluate the Functional Outcome of Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy in Osteoarthritis of Knee. ojmpc. 2021;27(2):80-84.
Available From
https://ojmpc.com/index.php/ojmpc/article/view/135
Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2021-12-07 2021-12-13 2021-12-19 2021-12-25 2021-12-31
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
Authors state no conflict of interest. Non Funded. The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use. 12.21 All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

© 2021by Jati S, Bansal H, Garg A, Jain Sand Published by Madhya Pradesh Orthopaedic Association. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ unported [CC BY NC 4.0].

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative disorder of synovial joints, which is characterized by progressive disintegration of articular cartilage, remodeling of adjacent bones by formation of new bone at joint margin (osteophytes), inflammation, sclerosis and cyst formation under the subchondral bone, synovitis and capsular fibrosis. This may be caused by any condition that can cause articular damages, and all unfavorable biomechanical conditions, which result in the mechanical overload that exceeds the ability of a joint to maintain itself [1]. Coexisting symptoms are joint stiffness, swelling, deformity, muscular fatigue, loss of function, and disability in the activities of daily living [2].

The goals for the treatment of osteoarthritis are pain relief, enhance joint mobility, prevention or correction of deformity, and slowing the disease progression process. NSAIDs and COX2 inhibitors provide symptomatic improvement in osteoarthritis but due to lack of proven disease-modifying potential, the relief is only temporary and the outcome deteriorates with time.

Oral steroids decrease inflammation and have a role in reducing pain but due to side effects, they are not recommended for long-term use. Intra-articular injections of corticosteroids and visco-elastic supplementations have been tried but American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines recently demonstrates inconclusive evidence and is against the use of hyaluronic acid visco-supplementation for patients with osteoarthritis knee [2-4].

Growth factors such as platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-b) activate tissue healing and have the potential for bone and cartilage regeneration, changing the joint milieu and homeostasis. But genetically engineered growth factors are very expensive hence limits their clinical use. Autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) contains a high concentration of these growth factors, which suppress inflammatory mediator concentrations and their gene expression and provokes healing and regeneration in synovium and cartilage tissue. This effect of PRP of improvement in pain score and early promising results has been demonstrated in some clinical series [5]. Hence we evaluated the efficacy & functional outcome of intra-articular injection of autologous platelet rich plasma therapy in the management of osteoarthritis of knee.

Material and methods

This prospective study was conducted on 50 consecutive patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis which were treated by intra-articular autologous PRP injection at our institute from 2018 to 2020.

The study was approved by the institutional ethical review committee and written informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Patients presenting to OPD with clinical symptoms of knee pain, knee joint effusion, and medial joint line tenderness were evaluated, and all these patients underwent knee joint AP and lateral weight bearing x-rays. Knee osteoarthritis was graded on these x rays as Kellgren and Lawrence classification (KL) of osteoarthritis knee [6].

Patients more than 40 years age with knee pain and joint tenderness having knee osteoarthritis of Kellgren-Lawrence classification grade II and III on weight bearing x-rays were included in the study. Patients with severe joint deformity (knee osteoarthritis KL grade IV), inflammatory or rheumatoid arthritis, hematological diseases (coagulopathies), infections or on immunosuppressive or anticoagulant therapy were excluded from the study.

Autologous PRP injection was prepared in the outpatient department itself by harvesting 30 ml of the patient’s venous blood in acid citrate dextrose (ACD) vacutainers. The blood so collected was centrifugated in two steps, first at a lower rate of 2400 rpm for 10 mins, following this the obtained PRP containing platelets was poured into another sterile test tube (without anticoagulant). Then the second centrifugation was done for this test tube at 3600 rpm for 15 mins to get a platelet focus. From this centrifuged test tube the lower third platelet rich plasma (PRP) was isolated. Under all aseptic precautions, 5 ml of this PRP was injected using 18 G needle via a superolateral approach into the involved knee joint.

Post injection, all the patients were prescribed ice fomentation, locally and paracetamol orally along with range of motion exercises. All the patients were evaluated by WOMAC score (Western Ontario and Mac master universities osteoarthritis index) [5]. The results were described as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). ANOVA test, paired t test, chi-square test, and the simple regression analysis were used to analyze correlations between the factors. P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

50 cases of osteoarthritis knee treated with autologous PRP were included in the study. 37 (74%) patients were females and 13 (26%) were males. The mean age in the study group was 52.02 ± 6.18 years (range 42 to 64 years). There were 12 (24.0%) patients in the age group 40 to 50 years, 20 (40%) patients were in the age group 51 to 60 years and 18 (36%) were more than 60 years. 38 (76.0%) patients had BMI > 25 kg/m2. 32 (64.0%) patients had the K-L Grade III and 18 (36%) patients had K-L Grade II osteoarthritis.


In K-L grade II, the mean WOMAC score, pretreatment was 57.11 ± 6.36, which improved to 53.76 ± 7.6 (p=0.000) at 2 weeks, to 31.97 ± 4.51 (p=0.001) at one month, to 26.97 ± 3.47 (p=0.001) at 3 months and to 22.11 ± 2.99 (p=0.001) at final follow-up of 6 months. In K-L grade III, the mean WOMAC score pretreatment was 59.21 + 5.63, which improved to 55.76 ± 7.6 (p=0.000) at 2 weeks, to 48.79 ± 5.42 (p=0.001) at one month, to 36.46 ± 4.36 (p=0.001) at 3 months, and to 32.12 ± 2.66 (p=0.001) at final follow-up of 6 months (table 1). All the patients were extremely satisfied with the treatment. We did not observe any adverse reactions or other possible serious complications after the PRP injection in any patient.

Table 1: Mean WOMAC score at different time intervals

Time intervalK-L Grade II (Mean ± SD)K-L Grade III (Mean ± SD)P value
Pre-treatment57.11 ± 6.3659.21+ 5.63-
At 15 days50.78 ± 7.6155.76 + 7.60.000*
At 1 month31.97 ± 4.5148.79 + 5.420.001*
At 3 months26.97 ± 3.4736.46 + 4.360.001*
At 6 months22.11 ± 2.9932.12 + 2.660.001*

Discussion

The pathophysiology of osteoarthritis involves a combination of mechanical, cellular and biochemical processes, which lead to an imbalance in pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. These cause changes in the composition and mechanical properties of the articular cartilage and finally leading to activation of proteolytic enzymes with destruction of articular cartilage [7-9]. Among various modalities of treatment of knee osteoarthritis, including conservative and surgical methods, recent treatments focuses on resolving these cytokine imbalances by using biologics [10-12].

Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains a high quantity of growth factors including transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-b), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) which accelerate the healing process and cell proliferation. These growth factors regulate the expression of the chondrocyte phenotype that may play an important role in disease progression. PRP inhibits the catabolism of articular cartilage which has been confirmed in study by Goldring [13].

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-b) present in PRP, increases expression of the chondrocyte phenotype and stimulates the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and stromal deposits and suppresses the synthesis of the cartilage glycoprotein and inflammatory mediator IL-1 [14,15]. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) plays an important role in cartilage cell proliferation and maintenance of the cartilage phenotype by increasing the synthesis of glycoprotein [16].

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a role to induce cartilage and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) stimulates the synthesis of glycoprotein and degrades its catabolism [17]. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) are additional growth factors that function independently or in cooperation for the regeneration of articular cartilage metabolism [18]. Thus growth factors present in the PRP lead to the regeneration of cartilage and prevent the degenerative process.

We evaluated the outcome of intra-articular injection of autologous PRP in KL grade II and grade III osteoarthritis knee in 50 patients with a mean age of 52 years. These patients were assessed for healing of cartilage and reduction in inflammation indirectly, by improvement in pain, function and quality of life in osteoarthritis knee as assessed by WOMAC score. We found significant improvement in WOMAC scores from pre-treatment to final follow-up at 6 months in both grade II and grade III OA knee. Patient profile and demographics were almost comparable in our study to the reported studies of Filardo et al, Raeissadatet al, Patel et al and Srikanthet al [19-22].

Overall mean WOMAC score at final follow-up in our study was 28 (32 for grade III and 22 for grade II), whereas the mean score in the study by Rahimzadeh et al, Vamshi et al and Güvendi et al was 31, 23, and 24 respectively [23-25]. We also did not observe any adverse reactions or any other serious complications in our patients like in other series.

We included patients of only grade II and III OA knee for intra-articular autologous PRP injection therapy like all other series [20-25], except for series by Filardo et al and Meheux et al, who considered all grades of OA knee for intra-articular PRP injection [19,26].

This is because the PRP injections work better in the early stages of osteoarthritis knee and do not provide the expected benefit in advance osteoarthritis of knee. We also found better improvement in WOMAC score in grade II osteoarthritis compared to grade III, confirming that the PRP works better in the early stages of osteoarthritis rather than the advanced stage. Our study is limited by relatively shorter follow-up, small sample size, and absence of a control group.

Conclusion

Early osteoarthritis and relatively younger age are the appropriate conditions for treatment with autologous intra-articular PRP injection. PRP is a safe, easy, minimally invasive and cheaper alternative in the management of OA knee which provides not only excellent pain relief but also improvement in quality of life and high rate of satisfaction. The relief starts immediately and it increases gradually with time.


References

1. Buckwalter JA, Martin JA, Brown TD. Perspectives on chondrocyte mechanobiology and osteoarthritis. Biorheology. 2006;43(3,4):603-9. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

2. Jevsevar DS. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline, 2nd edi. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Sep;21(9):571-6. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

3. Beitzel K, McCarthy MB, Russell RP, Apostolakos J, Cote MP, Mazzocca AD. Learning about PRP using cell-based models. Muscles Lig Tend J. 2014 May 8;4(1):38-45. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

4. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-the development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-96. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

5. Dhurat R, Sukesh M. Principles and Methods of Preparation of Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Review and Author's Perspective. J Cutan Aesth Surg. 2014 Oct-Dec;7(4):189-97. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

6. Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in Brief: Kellgren-Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug;474(8):1886-93. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

7. Hsu WK, Mishra A, Rodeo SR, Fu F, Terry MA, Randell P, Canale ST, Kelly FB. Platelet-rich plasma in orthopaedic applications: evidence-based recommendations for treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Dec;21(12):739-48. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

8. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ, Grodzinsky AJ. Articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:465-80. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

9. Pearle AD, Warren RF, Rodeo SA. Basic science of articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. Clin Sports Med. 2005 Jan;24(1):1-12. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

10. Goldring MB, Otero M, Plumb DA, Dragomir C, Favero M, El Hachem K, Hashimoto K, Roach HI, Olivotto E, Borzì RM, Marcu KB. Roles of inflammatory and anabolic cytokines in cartilage metabolism: signals and multiple effectors converge upon MMP-13 regulation in osteoarthritis. Eur Cell Mater. 2011 Feb 24;21:202-20. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

11. Everts PA, Knape JT, Weibrich G, Schönberger JP, Hoffmann J, Overdevest EP, Box HA, van Zundert A. Platelet-rich plasma and platelet gel: a review. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006 Jun;38(2):174-87. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

12. Marx RE. Platelet-rich plasma: evidence to support its use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Apr;62(4):489-96. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

13. Goldring MB. The role of the chondrocyte in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Sep;43(9):1916-26. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

14. Akeda K, An HS, Okuma M, Attawia M, Miyamoto K, Thonar EJ, Lenz ME, Sah RL, Masuda K. Platelet-rich plasma stimulates porcine articular chondrocyte proliferation and matrix biosynthesis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Dec;14(12):1272-80. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

15. Frazer A, Bunning RA, Thavarajah M, Seid JM, Russell RG. Studies on type II collagen and aggrecan production in human articular chondrocytes in vitro and effects of transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-1beta. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1994 Dec;2(4):235-45. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

16. Pujol JP, Chadjichristos C, Legendre F, Bauge C, Beauchef G, Andriamanalijaona R, Galera P, Boumediene K. Interleukin-1 and transforming growth factor-beta 1 as crucial factors in osteoarthritic cartilage metabolism. Connect Tissue Res. 2008;49(3):293-7. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

17. Schmidt MB, Chen EH, Lynch SE. A review of the effects of insulin-like growth factor and platelet derived growth factor on in vivo cartilage healing and repair. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 May;14(5):403-12. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

18. Martin JA, Buckwalter JA. The role of chondrocyte-matrix interactions in maintaining and repairing articular cartilage. Biorheology. 2000;37(1-2):129-40. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

19. Filardo G, Kon E, Di Martino A, Di Matteo B, Merli ML, Cenacchi A, Fornasari PM, Marcacci M. Platelet-rich plasma vs hyaluronic acid to treat knee degenerative pathology: study design and preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculo skelet Disord. 2012 Nov 23;13:229. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

20. Raeissadat SA, Rayegani SM, Hassanabadi H, Fathi M, Ghorbani E, Babaee M, Azma K. Knee Osteoarthritis Injection Choices: Platelet- Rich Plasma (PRP) Versus Hyaluronic Acid (A one-year randomized clinical trial). Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculo skelet Disord. 2015 Jan 7;8:1-8. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

21. Patel HR, Tankshalj KV, Patel ZM, Bhalodiya HP. The preponderance of side of involvement in Osteoarthritis knee. J Indian Orthop Rheumatol Assoc. 2016;2(2):70-2. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]


22. Srikanth VK, Fryer JL, Zhai G, Winzenberg TM, Hosmer D, Jones G. A meta-analysis of sex differences prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005 Sep;13(9):769-81. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

23. Rahimzadeh P, Imani F, Faiz SHR, Entezary SR, Zamanabadi MN, Alebouyeh MR. The effects of injecting intra-articular platelet-rich plasma or prolotherapy on pain score and function in knee osteoarthritis. Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Jan 4;13:73-9. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

24. Vamshi R, Bheemisetty V, Bollabathini R, Mahadevuni. A prospective study of intra-articular injections of platelet rich plasma in early osteoarthritis knee joint. Int J Res Orthop. 2018 Jan;4(1):133-40. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

25. UsluGüvendi E, Aşkin A, Güvendi G, Koçyiğit H. Comparison of Efficiency Between Corticosteroid and Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Therapies in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Arch Rheumatol. 2017 Nov 2;33(3):273-81. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

26. Meheux CJ, McCulloch PC, Lintner DM, Varner KE, Harris JD. Efficacy of Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar;32(3):495-505. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

Disclaimer / Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of Journals and/or the editor(s). Journals and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.