We planned the surgical treatment of the patients, with excision of the supernumerary toe and alignment to the toe with the metatarsal head. The child was operated under general anesthesia under tourniquet in supine position. A ‘Y’ shaped incision was given with the vertical limb towards the web space (fig 2).
Following this, the deep Y-shaped flaps were elevated and the proximal smaller accessary great toe was excised. The bigger toe with proper nail was displaced laterally and temporary fixed with a k-wire (fig 2).
Post operatively, a below knee slab was given and was removed at 2 weeks at the time suture removal. The k wire was removed at 4 week. At final follow up of 4 months, child has cosmetically acceptable foot and is comfortably able to wear normal footwear and trousers. There is slight shortening of great toe.
Discussion
Hallux varus is a very rare deformity as compared to hallux valgus [1]. Among the ethological types, the congenital variety of hallux varus is further rare variety as compared to other caused of varus deformity like surgical overcorrection of hallux valgus, idiopathic, spontaneous, inflammatory arthropathy or post-traumatic type [3].
Congenital hallux varus has multifactorial causes like thickened medial cords, medial slopes to the first metatarsocuneiform joints, first metatarsal longitudinal epiphyseal bracket (LEB; delta phalanx), shortened block first metatarsals, space occupying extra metatarsals with the first web spaces and ineffective abductor halluces and adductor hallucis insertions [2,4-7].
Since the deformity is present since birth, these patients present early. But, our case presented to us only at the age of eight month, when the child started mobilization and parents tried to put regular footwear to the child, which they were unable to do, due to the deformity. Dumbre reported a case of congenital hallux varus presenting at age of 23 year, which was complicated with soft tissue contracture, bony deformities and arthritis of joints [3].
Presentation and diagnosis is quiet obvious on clinical examination. Three types of congenital hallux varus are describes by Alfred [8].
1. 10 (primary) - not associated with any other deformity
2. 20 (secondary) – associated with polydactyly, syndatyly, metatarsal adductus, CTEV, LEX (longitudinal epiphyseal bracket / delta phalanx)
3. 30 (tertiary) – with severe deformities like diastrophic dwarfism
Our case was a secondary type, which was associated with both polydactyl and syndactyl. The deformity can range from mild (few degrees) to severe (to 900), ours was a severe type who had deformity almost 900.
Treatment of the deformity is by surgical correction and various techniques have been described. For mild to moderated deformity only soft tissue procedure are sufficient like, Farmer described a Y rotational skin flap and syndactylization of the first and second toes [2,9]. For very severe deformity and short metatarsal, bony procedures are needed like, Kelikian described reverse osteotomy [2,10].
McElvenny, described the removal of accessory bones, medial sesamoidectomy and capsulotomy, release of the medial fibrous band, reinforcement of the lateral capsule, transfixing of the metatarsophalangeal joint with a Kirschner wire and a partial syndactylization of the first and second toes [11]. Mills and Menelaus compared surgical outcomes of various procedure and found results of soft tissue procedures, such as McElvenny or Farmer technique, and those of arthrodesis were satisfactory, but the metatarsal osteotomy produced unsatisfactory results [12].
Recurrence of deformity after the surgical correction has been described if soft tissue correction alone for congenital hallux varus with LEX is done, due to persistent abnormal growth of the aberrant epiphysis of first metatarsal [2]. Hence to prevent recurrence, the combination of the two procedures, like farmers procedure combined with open wedge osteotomy are described as by shim et al [2]. Other procedures like resection or tenotomy of abductor hallucis muscle and tendon, arthrodesis and even amputation of toes have been described [2,13].
The choice of surgery depends on the type of deformity, associated features and the severity. Since our case was severe type we performed Farmers procedure alone with good results. At last follow, our patient was fine with cosmetically acceptable foot and able to wear normal footwear, without recurrence.
Conclusion
Congenital hallux varus is very rare deformity, which causes gross cosmetic and inability to wear normal footwear. Treatment is by surgical correction which gives excellent results and amputation is reserved as a salvage procedure.
References
1. Handelson, J. E. Congenital disorders of the toes. In: Gould JS. The Foot Book. 1st ed, Baltimore;Williams & Wilkins, 1988, p.107-8 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]
2. Shim JS, Lim TK, Koh KH, Lee DK. Surgical correction of congenital hallux varus. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6:216-22. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]
3. Dumbre Patil S , Parekh H, Dumbre Patil V, Joshi K. Congenital Hallux Varus with Polydactyly and Syndactyly- Correction in an Adult - A Case Report. J Orthop Case Report. 2014;4(2): 64-8. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]