Introduction
Fractures of the distal radius involving the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction are among commonly encountered problems by orthopaedic surgeons. A good outcome demands optimal reduction and maintenance to provide early functional independence without potential complications.
Despite the recognized growth of internal fixation, external fixation has maintained a role in the treatment of distal radius fractures because of its relative ease in application, versatility and reduced effects on the pericarpal soft tissues. The concept of non-bridging external fixator for distal radius fractures was first given by M. M. McQueen in 1998, subsequently procedural and technologic advancements have established its utility [1,2]. Few studies have been done on outcome of non-bridging external fixators in these fractures [3-11].
The purpose of this prospective randomised study was to analyse the utility of non-bridging external fixator in fractures of distal end radius in terms of functional and radiological outcome in the rural Indian population.
Material and Methods
This prospective study for assessment of the outcome of treatment of distal end radius with non-bridging external fixator is carried out from July 2010 to April 2012 at our institute after approval of the Ethical committee.
Three hundred and forty nine cases of fracture distal end radius attending the outpatient department were registered, 23 of these cases who met the inclusion criteria were treated with non-bridging external fixator and included in the study. One case was lost at follow up.
Thus 22 patients (24 radius – 2 bilateral), who were followed for a minimum of 6 months and whose data have been analysed for final conclusion formed the cohort. All patients more than 18 years and with less than 3 days old dorsally displaced distal radius fractures either extra or intra-articular with minimum 2 large articular fragments and dorsal angulations of >10o and/or radial shortening of more than equal to 5 mm, simple or grade 1 compound, were included in the study.
Patients having associated fracture ulna shaft, tendon injury, carpal injury or neuro-vascular involvement, were excluded from study. After proper clinical evaluation and standard radiological assessment fractures were classified as per Frykman’s classification system, mainly due to its better intra-observer reproducibility as compared with other systems [2].
All patients were admitted and after a preoperative workup, informed written consent and pre-anaesthetic check-up, were posted for the procedure. Standard preoperative surgical protocol and time out under appropriate anaesthesia four Schanz pins (2 pins proximally to fracture in shaft and 2 pin distally in the distal fragment) were inserted dorsolaterally and dorsomedially.
Care was taken to avoid tendon injury or penetration. After that fracture was reduced and confirmed fluoroscopically and the fixator frame application was completed (Figure 1).
Postoperatively, patient’s limb was kept elevated and active finger movements encouraged. Further shoulder, elbow and wrist, active and passive movements were started from day one as per the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Guidelines [12]. Patients were followed up regularly (2, 4, 6 and 16 weeks).
Patients were assessed both clinically and on radiographs. The external fixator was removed at 6 weeks, when bridging callus was seen in at least three cortices in two views and clinically there was no pain / tenderness at fracture site. Objective clinical assessment included range of motion of the wrist as measured in all the six planes with the help of a goniometer and grip strengths measurement on both sides.
Standard anterio-posterior and lateral X-rays were taken at each follow up to assess the position of the fracture fragments, union status and for measurements of parameters by like radial length, radial angle and volar angle. DASH questionnaire was used for functional assessment. Complications, if any were noted and suitably dealt. The data thus obtained were statistically analysed using Chi square and student t-test on SPSS (Statistical Presentation System Software) for Windows version 17.
Results
Out of 22 patients enrolled, 13 were males and 9 females with a dominant hand injury in 16, 4 had injury in non-dominant limb and bilateral involvement in 2 cases. The average age of patients was 47.27 years.
Out of 22, 3 (13%) had a Frykman’s type I fracture, 9 (41%) had a type II, 4 (18%) had type III, 4 (18%) had type IV injury and 2 (10%) had type VI injury. Four had associated ulnar styloid fracture. The Flexion-Extension arc at the different follow up was analysed, there was an average change from 73° (36.2° flexion and 32.7° extension) at the 1st follow up at 2 weeks to 147° (73° flexion and 74° extension) at 16 weeks. Similarly the improvement in Pronation-Supination arc was 107° (48° supination and 59° pronation) at 2 weeks, which improved to 164° (79° supination and 85° pronation) over the period of 16 weeks.
Adduction and Abduction improved from 22° and 8° respectively at 2 weeks to 32° and 11° respectively at 16 weeks post-operative (Figure 1).
Improvement in range of movement improvement in the patients on 4th week and 16th weeks on applying the paired t-test reveals a statistically significant change in the outcome with less than 0.0001 for Flexion – Extension, 0.004 for Abduction – Adduction and 0.001 for Pronation – Supination (Figure 2). The average radial angle restored post operatively to 18.93° (range 12.7° to 25°). The average radial length restored to 11.68 mm (range 8 mm to 14.4 mm).