Orthopaedic Journal of MP Chapter

Publisher: Madhya Pradesh Orthopaedic Association www.mpioa.com
E-ISSN:2582-7243, P-ISSN:2320-6993
2021 Volume 27 Number 2 Jul-Dec

A case of congenital pseudoarthrosis tibia treated by four in one procedure and review of literature

Jain S1, Ajmera A2, Jain M3*

1 S Jain, Department of Orthopaedics, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

2 A Ajmera, Department of Orthopaedics, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

3* Mitul Jain, Senior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Case report: Standard methods of treatment for congenital pseudoarthrosis of tibia (CPT) including internal fixation with intramedullary rodding, external fixation or ilizarov fixation, vascularized fibula transfer or combinations have varied results with high rates of recurrence. We report such a rare case of congenital pseudoarthrosis tibia which failed to unite with primary surgery of ilizarov and then was successfully treated and united with four in one procedure which involves creating a synostosis between proximal and distal ends of both tibia and fibula. The procedure is reliable and effective in preventing re-fractures.

Keywords: Congenital pseudoarthrosis tibia, Four in one procedure, Tibia fibula synostosis

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Mitul Jain, Senior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Email:
Jain S, Ajmera A, Jain M, A case of congenital pseudoarthrosis tibia treated by four in one procedure and review of literature. ojmpc. 2021;27(2):99-103.
Available From
https://ojmpc.com/index.php/ojmpc/article/view/144
Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2021-12-07 2021-12-13 2021-12-19 2021-12-25 2021-12-31
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
Authors state no conflict of interest. Non Funded. The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use. 11.92 All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

© 2021by Jain S, Ajmera A, Jain Mand Published by Madhya Pradesh Orthopaedic Association. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ unported [CC BY NC 4.0].

Introduction

Congenital pseudoarthrosis of tibia (CPT) is a very rare condition, with incidence of about 1 in 25000 live birth [1]. It is most commonly associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 in more than 50 % of the cases [1]. It has also been associated to fibrous dysplasia or Campanacci’s osteofibrous dysplasia [2].

Loss of neurofibromin protein and presence of hamartomas are the primary pathologies in neurofibromatosis that prevents osteoblastic differentiation, bone remodeling or fracture healing. The soft tissue at the pseudarthrotic site is composed of variable admixture of fibrous tissue, fibrocartilage, and hyaline cartilage with evidence of enchondral ossification [3].

Standard methods of treatment for CPT including internal fixation with intramedullary rodding, external fixation or ilizarov fixation, vascularized fibula transfer or combinations have varied results with high rate of recurrence [4-9].

4 in 1 osteosynthesis used to treat CPT, involves creating a synostosis between proximal and distal ends of both tibia and fibula [10, 11].

We report such a rare case of congenital pseudoarthrosis tibia which failed to unite with primary surgery of ilizarov and then was successfully treated and united with four in one procedure and also reviewed the literature on the topic.

Case report

A 5-year-old female child, presented in our outpatient department, with chief complain of deformity, shortening of right leg and inability to bear weight on affected right leg since birth. The child was delivered at full term with normal vaginal delivery. She had history of full immunization as per the national immunization schedule.

Parents and child denied any other significant past medical history. Familial history was unremarkable for any other congenital disorder. As per the parents, some deformity of right leg was noticed during the neonatal period but no treatment was taken. Child achieved all milestones at appropriate age except for ambulation, which was delayed. Child had a history of trivial trauma due to fall while playing 2 months back and had been non ambulatory since then.

On clinical examination, distal fourth right leg was deformed with severe bowing and procurvatum deformity of about 900 (fig 1). There were clear signs of non-union of fracture of tibia and fibula with frank painless abnormal mobility present in all the planes at lower third leg. The leg musculature was severely hypotrophied. Proximal end of bone was dimpling the skin which appeared smooth and shiny.

On palpation local temperature was comparable on both sides. Distal pulsations of dorsalis pedis artery and posterior tibial arteries were palpable. Ipsilateral hip and knee examination were unremarkable but active movements of ipsilateral ankle were restricted.

Shortening of about 5 cm was present on the right side. No other deformities were seen anywhere else in the body. Routine radiographs of the limb including AP and lateral views were done which showed pencil thin severely hypotrophied tibia fibula with clear fracture at level of lower third leg.

The bone ends were atrophic and thinned out. Severe angular deformity was present at the fracture site and ankle seen in severe calcaneus position. The knee joint appeared normal.

After routine hematological work up and pre anesthetic check-up patient was primarily treated by excision of hamartomatous tissue along with ilizarov application, corticotomy and intramedullary rod fixation to achieve union and prevent refracture (Figure 2).

After 4 months of bone transport and compression at fracture site, the pseudoarthrosis failed to show signs of union, although good regenerate bone was formed at corticotomy site. Illizarov was removed and patient was planned for re-surgery with four in one osteosynthesis technique to achieve a tibio fibular synostosis (Figure 3).

Copious amount of cortico-cancellous bone graft was obtained from the ipsilateral iliac crest. Utilizing the previous incision, the pseudoarthrosis site was exposed and remnants of fibrous periosteal and hamartomatous tissue were removed (Figure 4).

Both ends i.e. proximal and distal ends of the both the bones tibia and fibula were freshened and the copious amount of cortico-cancellous auto-graft was placed between the tibia fibula to achieve a synostosis between tibia and fibula both proximally and distally. An external fixator was applied and trans-calcaneal intramedullary rush nail was also fixed to protect the union. Postoperatively, regular pin tract dressings were done.

Patient was followed regularly to confirm an uneventful postoperative period. External fixator was removed after 6 months’ post operatively. The Child achieved union at pseudoarthrosis site at 9 months, but had limb length discrepancy and is explained and planned for limb lengthening once she attains maturity (fig 5).

Figure 1:Antero-posterior (a) and lateral (b) X rays and pre-operative clinical photograph (c) of the patient showing typical features of congenital pseudoarthrosis tibia.
ojmpc_144_01.JPG


Figure 2: Antero-posterior (a) and lateral (b) X rays after primary surgery by hamartomatous tissue excision, ilizarov and intra-medullary fixation
ojmpc_144_02.JPG

Figure 3: Antero-posterior (a) and lateral (b) X rays after ilizarov removal showing the nonunion.
ojmpc_144_03.JPG

Figure 4:Intra-operative photographs (a), antero-posterior (b) and lateral (c) X rays of 4 in 1 procedure showing cortico-cancellous auto-graft between the tibia fibula to achieve a synostosisand external fixator with trans-calcaneal intramedullary rush nail in place.
ojmpc_144_04.JPG

Figure 5:8 months follow up antero-posterior (b) and lateral (c) X rays after 4 in 1 procedure showing sound union after external fixator removal.
ojmpc_144_05.JPG

Discussion

Congenital pseudoarthrosis tibia, often associated with neurofibromatosis type 1, is a progressive disorder that has troubled orthopedicians for more than a century [3]. Many theories have been given with regards to pathogenesis of the disease. As per McElvenny’s thickened, adherent periosteum which constricts tibia-fibula is the cause of atrophy, fracture and pseudarthrosis [12].

Boyd demonstrated osteolytic fibromatosis as the cause of CPT from a study of amputated specimens [13]. Codivilla was the first to recognize that the periosteum in CPT is diseased and he recommended osteo-periosteal grafting as the treatment [14].

The natural history of CPT is quite unfavorable and results are seldom optimal. The deformity progresses from anterolateral bowing at birth to eventual fracture of tibia fibula which fails to unite. Fracture of tibia lead to absence of weight bearing bone and instability. Fracture of fibula causes proximal migration and valgus at ankle joint. The anterior bow of the tibia causes the foot to assume a severe dorsi-flexed or calcaneus position of the ankle. Due to lack of loading of distal tibia physis the growth rate is reduced causing limb length discrepancy and atrophy of the bones and muscles [13].

Also there is compensatory overgrowth of femur as well as coxa valga that may even cause hip dysplasia. Many classifications of CPT have been described. Boyd classified CPT into 6 types with type 1 being anterior bowing of tibia, type 2 is the most common type with hourglass constriction, type 3 is cystic lesions of tibia, type 4 is sclerotic lesion with stress fractures, type 5 includes dysplastic fibula and type 6 is intra-osseousneurofibroma [13].

Crawford classified CPT into 4 categories. Type 1, non-dysplastic type with anterolateral bowing of tibia with cortical thickening at apex of deformity but medullary canal is preserved; type 2, dysplastic type with anterolateral bowing and narrowing of medullary canal; type 3, cystic lesions present in tibia along with deformity and type 4, pseudoarthrosis [15].


None of these classifications consider the status of the fibula, which plays a role and also a key factor in the pathology and management of CPT. Choi classification was the first to highlight the important consideration of proximal fibular migration [16].

Although they documented the fibular migration, Choi et al did not recommend any treatment for this. Child with CPT presents with mild deformity i.e. anterolateral bowing of tibia, which is present since birth. The deformity eventually progresses and results in moderate to severe bowing and atrophy of bone, which ends into fracture of tibia and fibula which fails to unite [1,12].

Foot deformity, leg-length discrepancy (LLD), knee malalignment and even hip dysplasia due to valgus deformity of the proximal femur are myriad of conditions that are all considered part of the natural history of CPT due to involvement of fibula causing valgus [10].

Our patient also presented with similar complains of nonunion of tibia and fibula with severe deformity and hypotrophy of leg musculature and bone along with ankle dorsiflexion deformity. If the child presents early with just bowing of tibia, then treatment is focused on preventing the fracture using bracing. Adjunctive treatments such as bisphosphonates, Bone Morphogenic Protein (BMP 2, 7) and electric stimulation have also been used [3].

Once the bone has fractured non-union is the rule and surgery remains the only choice of treatment. Primary objective of surgery is to obtain and maintain union at fracture site and secondarily correct the bowing of tibia and prevent proximal fibular migration [10]. The standard methods of treatment for CPT include: internal fixation with intramedullary rodding [4, 5], external fixation (predominantly ilizarov apparatus), combination treatment with an ilizarov and rodding construct [6, 7] or vascularized fibula transfer [8, 9].

Excision of fibrous hamartoma is often used along with these procedures. The results of these procedures are varied with high rate of recurrence of fracture and no consensus exists, on what surgery offers best union rates and least recurrence or on the appropriate age of surgery [10]. We also considered our patients primarily for excision of the hamartomatous tissue and ilizarov, but failed to achieve desired results.

A newer modality of treatment termed as 4 in 1 osteosynthesis as suggested by Choi et al has been used in atrophic type CPT. It involves creating and achieving a synostosis between the proximal and distal ends of tibia and fibula by use of bone grafts. The procedure has yielded favorable results and has been effective in preventing re-fractures in almost 100% patients [10, 11].

By the procedure we could also achieve union and synostosis for the pseudoarthrotic site, although we still are skeptical to remove the intra-meduallary rod and are planning for limb lengthening. Amputation remains the salvage procedure when all the treatment modalities have failed and articular functions are compromised.

Conclusion

Congenital pseudoarthrosis of tibia is a rare pediatric disorder in which fibrous hamartomatous tissue between the bones ends leads to formation of pseudoarthrosis. The entity is difficult to treat with high rate of recurrence with standard treatments. 4 in 1 osteosynthesis which involves creating and achieving a synostosis between the proximal and distal ends of tibia and fibula by use of bone grafts is a reliable and effective procedure in preventing re-fractures.

References

1. Khan T, Joseph B. Controversies in the management of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia and fibula. Bone Joint J. 2013 Aug;95-B(8):1027-34. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

2. Crawford AH, Schorry EK. Neurofibromatosis update. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(3):413-23. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

3. Das SP, Ganesh S, Pradhan S, Singh D, Mohanty RN. Effectiveness of recombinant human bonemorphogenetic protein-7 in the management of congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia: a randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2014 Sep;38(9):1987-92. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

4. Dobbs MB, Rich MM, Gordon JE, Szymanski DA, Schoenecker PL. Use of an intramedullary rod for treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jun;86(6):1186-97 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

5. Johnston CE 2nd. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: results of technical variations in the charnley-williams procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Oct;84(10):1799-810. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

6. Agashe MV, Song SH, Refai MA, Park KW, Song HR. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia treated with a combination of Ilizarov's technique and intramedullary rodding. Acta Orthop. 2012 Oct;83(5):515-22. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

7. Shabtai L, Ezra E, Wientroub S, Segev E. Congenital tibialpseudarthrosis, changes in treatment protocol. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2015 Sep;24(5):444-9. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

8. Kalra GD, Agarwal A. Experience with free fibula transfer with screw fixation as a primary modality of treatment for congenital pseudarthosis of tibia in children - Series of 26 cases. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012 Sep;45(3):468-77. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

9. Weiland AJ, Weiss AP, Moore JR, Tolo VT. Vascularized fibular grafts in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Jun;72(5):654-62. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]


10. Choi IH, Lee SJ, Moon HJ, Cho TJ, Yoo WJ, Chung CY, Park MS. "4-in-1 osteosynthesis" for atrophic-type congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Sep;31(6):697-704. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

11. Paley D. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: biological and biomechanical considerations to achieve union and prevent refracture. J Child Orthop. 2019 Apr 1;13(2):120-133. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

12. McelvennyRT. Congenital pseudo-arthrosis of the tibia; the findings in one case and a suggestion as to possible etiology and treatment. Q Bull Northwest Univ Med Sch. 1949;23(4):413-23. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

13. Boyd HB. Pathology and natural history of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Jun;(166):5-13. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

14. Codivilla A. The classic: On the means of lengthening, in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. 1905. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Dec;466(12):2903-9 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

15. Crawford AH Jr, Bagamery N. Osseous manifestations of neurofibromatosis in childhood. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986 Jan-Feb;6(1):72-88. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

16. Choi IH, Cho TJ, Moon HJ. Ilizarov treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: a multi-targeted approach using the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011 Mar;3(1):1-8. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

Disclaimer / Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of Journals and/or the editor(s). Journals and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.